[Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell tumor treated with DVT regimen: a case report and literature review].

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and highly aggressive hematological malignancy, there is no standard treatment and the prognosis is very poor. Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University report a case of 85-year-old BPDCN male patient treated with DVT regimen (decitabine combined with Venetoclax and thalidomide) and achieved complete remission. The patient with skin nodules and the pathology diagnosed BPDCN, the next generation sequencing of skin nodules showed mutations of IDH2 and ASXL1. DVT (decitabine combined with Venetoclax and thalidomide) has significant efficacy with rapid and deep remission for BPDCN, and the adverse effects is less, especially suitable for elderly patients who cannot tolerate intense chemotherapy.

Targeting DNMT3A-mediated oxidative phosphorylation to overcome ibrutinib resistance in mantle cell lymphoma.

The use of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib achieves a remarkable clinical response in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Acquired drug resistance, however, is significant and affects long-term survival of MCL patients. Here, we demonstrate that DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) is involved in ibrutinib resistance. We find that DNMT3A expression is upregulated upon ibrutinib treatment in ibrutinib-resistant MCL cells. Genetic and pharmacological analyses reveal that DNMT3A mediates ibrutinib resistance independent of its DNA-methylation function. Mechanistically, DNMT3A induces the expression of MYC target genes through interaction with the transcription factors MEF2B and MYC, thus mediating metabolic reprogramming to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Targeting DNMT3A with low-dose decitabine inhibits the growth of ibrutinib-resistant lymphoma cells both in vitro and in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model. These findings suggest that targeting DNMT3A-mediated metabolic reprogramming to OXPHOS with decitabine provides a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome ibrutinib resistance in relapsed/refractory MCL.

Prognostic analysis according to European LeukemiaNet 2022 risk stratification for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with decitabine.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the revised European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-2022 risk stratification model for 123 elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with decitabine chemotherapy. RESULTS: Based on the ELN-2022 risk stratification, 15 (12.2%), 51 (41.5%), and 57 (46.3%) patients were classified as having favorable, intermediate, and high-risk AML, respectively. In comparison with the ELN-2017 risk stratification, the ELN-2022 risk stratification re-assigned 26 (21.1%) and three (2.4%) patients to the adverse and favorable risk groups, respectively. Survival analysis revealed distinctive overall survival (OS) outcomes among the ELN-2022 risk groups (6-month OS rate: 73.3%, 52.9%, and 47.7% for favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively; P = 0.101), with a parallel trend observed in the event-free survival (EFS) (6-month EFS rate: 73.3%, 52.9%, and 45.6% for favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively; P = 0.049). Notably, both OS and EFS in the favorable risk group were significantly superior in comparison to that of the adverse risk group (OS: P = 0.040, EFS: P = 0.030). Although the ELN-2022 C-index (0.559) was greater than the ELN-2017 C-index (0.539), the result was not statistically significant (P = 0.059). Based on the event net reclassification index, we consistently observed significant improvements in the ELN-2022 risk stratification for overall survival (0.21 at 6 months). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the revised ELN-2022 risk stratification model may have improved the risk classification of elderly AML patients treated with hypomethylating agents compared to the ELN-2017 risk stratification model.

Decitabine-containing conditioning improved outcomes for children with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a rare clonal hematopoietic disorder in children. The risk stratification system and treatment strategy for adults are unfit for children. The role of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in higher-risk childhood MDS has not been identified. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children with higher-risk MDS at one single center. A retrospective study was conducted in children with higher-risk MDS undergoing HSCT between September 2019 and March 2023 at Blood Diseases Hospital CAMS. The clinical characteristics and transplantation information were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 27 patients were analyzed, including 11 with MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB), 14 with MDS-EB in transformation (MDS-EBt) or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), and 2 with therapy-related MDS/AML (t-MDS/AML). Eight patients harbored monosomy 7. Before transplantation, induction therapy was administered to 25 patients, and 19 of them achieved bone marrow blasts <5% before HSCT. The stem cell source was unmanipulated-related bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells for nineteen patients and unrelated cord blood for eight. All patients received decitabine-containing and Bu/Cy-based myeloablative conditioning; 26 patients achieved initial engraftment. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) at 100 days were 65.4% and 42.3%, respectively. The incidence of cGvHD was 38.5%. The median follow-up was 26 (range 4-49) months after transplantation. By the end of follow-up, two patients died of complications and two died of disease progression. The probability of 3-year overall survival (OS) was 84.8% (95%CI, 71.1 to 98.5%). In summary, decitabine-containing myeloablative conditioning resulted in excellent outcomes for children with higher-risk MDS undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

Flow cytometry of DNMT1 as a biomarker of hypomethylating therapies.

The 5-azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) are noncytotoxic, differentiation-inducing therapies approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemias (AML), and under evaluation as maintenance therapy for AML postallogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and to treat hemoglobinapathies. Malignant cell cytoreduction is thought to occur by S-phase specific depletion of the key epigenetic regulator, DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) that, in the case of cancers, thereby releases terminal-differentiation programs. DNMT1-targeting can also elevate expression of immune function genes (HLA-DR, MICA, MICB) to stimulate graft versus leukemia effects. In vivo, there is a large inter-individual variability in DEC and 5-AZA activity because of pharmacogenetic factors, and an assay to quantify the molecular pharmacodynamic effect of DNMT1-depletion is a logical step toward individualized or personalized therapy. We developed and analytically validated a flow cytometric assay for DNMT1 epitope levels in blood and bone marrow cell subpopulations defined by immunophenotype and cell cycle state. Wild type (WT) and DNMT1 knock out (DKO) HC116 cells were used to select and optimize a highly specific DNMT1 monoclonal antibody. Methodologic validation of the assay consisted of cytometry and matching immunoblots of HC116-WT and -DKO cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells; flow cytometry of H116-WT treated with DEC, and patient samples before and after treatment with 5-AZA. Analysis of patient samples demonstrated assay reproducibility, variation in patient DNMT1 levels prior to treatment, and DNMT1 depletion posttherapy. A flow-cytometry assay has been developed that in the research setting of clinical trials can inform studies of DEC or 5-AZA treatment to achieve targeted molecular pharmacodynamic effects and better understand treatment-resistance/failure.

[Platelet Count Doubling after One Course of Demethylated Drug Therapeutic Predicts the Treatment Response and Efficacy of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive value of platelet doubling (platelet count doubling) after one course of hypomethylating agents (HMA) on the treatment response and efficacy of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Clinical and pathological data of 75 patients who received HMA in our hospital from January 2017 to March 2022 were collected and analyzed. All patients were divided into two groups according to whether their platelet count doubled after one course of treatment, including platelet doubling group and non-doubling group, and statistical analysis was performed to compare the treatment response and efficacy between the two groups. In addition, platelet count changes were compared between azacitidine and decitabine therapy. RESULTS: Compared with the non-doubling platelet count group, the ORR of the doubling platelet group was significantly better after 3 courses of treatment (P =0.002), and there was a statistically significant difference in the number of HI between the two groups (P =0.005). In addition, the median survival time (MST) was 26 months in the platelet doubling group and 11 months in the non-doubling group (P =0.001). The overall survival (OS) and 1- and 2-year survival rates of the platelet doubling group were also significantly better than those of the non-doubing group. Multivariate COX analysis showed that platelet count doubling was an independent predictor of OS in MDS patients after 1 course of treatment (P =0.013). There was no significant difference in the response rate of platelet count doubling between MDS patients treated with azacitidine and decitabine (33.3% vs 23.8%, P >0.05). CONCLUSION: Platelet count doubling after one course of treatment can be used as a predictor of response rate and survival of demethylated drug therapy in MDS patients. In addition, there was no significant difference in the response rate of platelets in MDS patients treated with azacitidine or dicetabine.

The potential of epigenetic therapy to target the 3D epigenome in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Three-dimensional (3D) epigenome remodeling is an important mechanism of gene deregulation in cancer. However, its potential as a target to counteract therapy resistance remains largely unaddressed. Here, we show that epigenetic therapy with decitabine (5-Aza-mC) suppresses tumor growth in xenograft models of pre-clinical metastatic estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast tumor. Decitabine-induced genome-wide DNA hypomethylation results in large-scale 3D epigenome deregulation, including de-compaction of higher-order chromatin structure and loss of boundary insulation of topologically associated domains. Significant DNA hypomethylation associates with ectopic activation of ER-enhancers, gain in ER binding, creation of new 3D enhancer-promoter interactions and concordant up-regulation of ER-mediated transcription pathways. Importantly, long-term withdrawal of epigenetic therapy partially restores methylation at ER-enhancer elements, resulting in a loss of ectopic 3D enhancer-promoter interactions and associated gene repression. Our study illustrates the potential of epigenetic therapy to target ER+ endocrine-resistant breast cancer by DNA methylation-dependent rewiring of 3D chromatin interactions, which are associated with the suppression of tumor growth.

Epigenetic therapy: Research progress of decitabine in the treatment of solid tumors.

Decitabine's early successful therapeutic outcomes in hematologic malignancies have led to regulatory approvals from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for addressing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These approvals have sparked keen interest in exploring the potential of decitabine for treating solid tumors. Continuous preclinical and clinical trials have proved that low doses of decitabine also bring benefits in treating solid tumors, and various proposed mechanisms attempt to explain the potential efficacy. It is important to note that the application of decitabine in solid tumors is still considered investigational. This article reviews the application mechanism and current status of decitabine in the treatment of solid tumors.

The predictive value of BTG1 for the response of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia to decitabine.

BACKGROUND: Decitabine has been widely used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however as AML is a heterogeneous disease, not all patients benefit from decitabine. This study aimed to identify markers for predicting the response to decitabine. METHODS: An intersection of in vitro experiments and bioinformatics was performed using a combination of epigenetic and transcriptomic analysis. A tumor-suppressor gene associated with methylation and the response to decitabine was screened. Then the sensitivity and specificity of this marker in predicting the response to decitabine was confirmed in 54 samples from newly diagnosed AML patients treated with decitabine plus IA regimen in a clinical trial (ChiCTR2000037928). RESULTS: In vitro experiments showed that decitabine caused hypomethylation and upregulation of BTG1, while downregulation of BTG1 attenuated the inhibitory effect of decitabine. In newly diagnosed AML patients who received decitabine plus IA regimen, the predictive value of BTG1 to predict complete remission (CR) was assigned with a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 100.0% when BTG1 expression was < 0.292 (determined using real-time quantitative PCR), with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.933, P = 0.021. The predictive value of BTG1 to predict measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity was assigned with a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 80.0% when BTG1 expression was < 0.292 (AUC = 0.892, P = 0.012). Patients were divided into low and high BTG1 expression groups according to a cutoff of 0.292, and the CR rate of the low-expression group was significantly higher than that of the high-expression group (97.5% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low expression of BTG1 was associated with CR and MRD negativity in newly diagnosed AML patients treated with a decitabine-containing regimen, suggesting that BTG1 is a potential marker for predicting the response to decitabine in newly diagnosed AML. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000037928.

DNA methylation landscape reveals GNAS as a decitabine-responsive marker in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The demethylation agent decitabine (DAC) is a pivotal non-intensive alternative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, patient responses to DAC are highly variable, and predictive biomarkers are warranted. Herein, the DNA methylation landscape of patients treated with a DAC-based combination regimen was compared with that of patients treated with standard chemotherapy to develop a molecular approach for predicting clinical response to DAC. METHODS: Twenty-five non-M3 AML patients were enrolled and subjected to DNA methylation sequencing and profiling to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and genes of interest. Moreover, the effects of a DAC-based regimen on apoptosis and gene expression were explored using Kasumi-1 and K562 cells. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 541 DMRs that were specifically responsive to DAC, among which 172 DMRs showed hypomethylation patterns upon treatment and were aligned with the promoter regions of 182 genes. In particular, GNAS was identified as a critical DAC-responsive gene, with in vitro GNAS downregulation leading to reduced cell apoptosis induced by DAC and cytarabine combo treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We found that GNAS is a DAC-sensitive gene in AML and may serve as a prognostic biomarker to assess the responsiveness of patients with AML to DAC-based therapy.

Hypomethylating agent monotherapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a French multicentric retrospective study.

Very few data are available about hypomethylating agent (HMA) efficiency in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemias (CBF-AML). Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HMA in the specific subset of CBF-AML. Here, we report the results of a multicenter retrospective French study about efficacy of HMA monotherapy, used frontline or for R/R CBF-AML. Forty-nine patients were included, and received a median of 5 courses of azacitidine (n = 46) or decitabine (n = 3). ORR was 49% for the whole cohort with a median time to response of 112 days. After a median follow-up of 72.3 months, median OS for the total cohort was 10.6 months. In multivariate analysis, hematological relapse of CBF-AML at HMA initiation was significantly associated with a poorer OS (HR: 2.13; 95%CI: 1.04-4.36; p = 0.038). Responders had a significantly improved OS (1-year OS: 75%) compared to non-responders (1-year OS: 15.3%; p < 0.0001). Hematological improvement occurred for respectively 28%, 33% and 48% for patients who were red blood cell or platelet transfusion-dependent, or who experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia at HMA initiation. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of HMA. Our study highlights that HMA is a well-tolerated therapeutic option with moderate clinical activity for R/R CBF-AML and for patients who cannot handle intensive chemotherapy.

Fast proliferating and slowly migrating non-small cell lung cancer cells are vulnerable to decitabine and retinoic acid combinatorial treatment.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are often elderly or unfit and thus cannot tolerate standard aggressive therapy regimes. In our study, we test the efficacy of the DNA-hypomethylating agent decitabine (DAC) in combination with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), which has been shown to possess little systemic adverse effects. Screening a broad panel of 56 NSCLC cell lines uncovered a decrease in cell viability after the combination treatment in 77% of the cell lines. Transcriptomics, proteomics, proliferation and migration profiling revealed that fast proliferating and slowly migrating cell lines were more sensitive to the drug combination. The comparison of mutational profiles found oncogenic KRAS mutations only in sensitive cells. Additionally, different cell lines showed a heterogeneous gene expression response to the treatment pointing to diverse mechanisms of action. Silencing KRAS, RIG-I or RARB partially reversed the sensitivity of KRAS-mutant NCI-H460 cells. To study resistance, we generated two NCI-H460 cell populations resistant to ATRA and DAC, which migrated faster and proliferated slower than the parental sensitive cells and showed signs of senescence. In summary, this comprehensive dataset uncovers a broad sensitivity of NSCLC cells to the combinatorial treatment with DAC and ATRA and indicates that migration and proliferation capacities correlate with and could thus serve as determinants for drug sensitivity in NSCLC.

Phase Ib study of sabatolimab (MBG453), a novel immunotherapy targeting TIM-3 antibody, in combination with decitabine or azacitidine in high- or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

The safety and efficacy of sabatolimab, a novel immunotherapy targeting T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), was assessed in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients with HMA-naive revised International Prognostic System Score (IPSS-R) high- or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR/vHR-MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Sabatolimab + HMA had a safety profile similar to that reported for HMA alone and demonstrated durable clinical responses in patients with HR/vHR-MDS. These results support the ongoing evaluation of sabatolimab-based combination therapy in MDS, CMML, and acute myeloid leukemia.

Hypomethylating agent decitabine sensitizes diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to venetoclax.

Despite recent advances in the therapy of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), many patients are still not cured. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. The anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) gene is commonly dysregulated in DLBCL due to various mechanisms such as chromosomal translocation t(14;18)(q32;q21) and copy number alterations; however, targeting BCL-2 with the selective inhibitor, venetoclax, led to response in only a minority of patients. Thus, we sought to identify a rational combination partner of venetoclax to improve its activity against DLBCL cells. Utilizing a functional assay, dynamic BH3 profiling, we found that the DNA hypomethylating agent decitabine increased mitochondrial apoptotic priming and BCL-2 dependence in DLBCL cells. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that decitabine suppressed the pro-survival PI3K-AKT pathway and altered the mitochondria membrane composition in DLBCL cell lines. Additionally, it induced a DNA damage response and increased BAX and BAK activities. The combination of decitabine and venetoclax synergistically suppressed proliferation of DLBCL cells both in vitro and in vivo in a DLBCL cell line-derived xenograft mouse model. Our study suggests that decitabine plus venetoclax is a promising combination to explore clinically in DLBCL.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Anemia With Excess Blasts (RAEB) Who Receive Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs).

BACKGROUND: We sought to understand the clinical effectiveness associated with use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) for patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB; an established proxy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms) in contemporary and representative real-world settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, a linkage of cancer registry and Medicare claims data, to identify patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with RAEB, between 2009 and 2017 in the United States, and who received AZA or DEC as first-line therapy. Outcomes measured were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and incidence of progression-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RESULTS: Of 973 eligible patients, 738 (75.8%) received AZA and 235 (24.2%) received DEC; 6.4% received hematopoietic cell transplantation during follow-up. In the overall population, median OS was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.9-15.0), median EFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 4.9-5.7), and 38.0% of patients progressed to AML. Incidences of AML progression and death were 25.6% and 29.9%, respectively, at Year 1, and 34.3% and 44.8%, respectively, at Year 2. There were no significant differences in clinical benefits between AZA and DEC. CONCLUSION: Median OS with both HMAs remained significantly shorter than in the AZA-001 clinical trial, highlighting how patient outcomes vary between clinical and real-world settings. Further research is required to understand why these disparities exist.